Client story · Email and identity security

Protecting the payment decision Email, identity and payment controls after a business email compromise

After responding to a business email compromise at OYA, a 50-user financial services firm, we hardened Microsoft 365, identity and the checks around payment changes. The work targets the point where a convincing email could turn into a fraudulent payment.

The brief

In a business where instructions move between many parties, a familiar name can carry a lot of authority

OYA works with advisers, brokers, custodians, lawyers, suppliers and settlement agents, often around high-value, time-sensitive transactions. An apparently routine request can be acted on quickly in that setting.

Following our response to the incident, we reviewed the path from the sender and mailbox through to the decision to change payment details, and connected Microsoft 365 security with the checks applied when money is about to move.

01Incident response

Response to the BEC event, followed by security hardening

02Email protection

Email authentication, sender checks and anti-impersonation

03Identity and mailbox

MFA, Conditional Access and visibility of account misuse

04Payment verification

High-risk payment changes checked beyond the email

Risk map

Where the controls interrupt the route to payment fraud

A fraudulent request can reach a payment decision through an impersonated sender or a compromised account. We placed controls along each route and at the point where they meet.

Route 1Impersonated sender

Spoofed or lookalike executive and supplier requests

  1. Email authentication
  2. Sender checks
  3. Anti-impersonation

Makes fraudulent executive and supplier requests harder to pass off as legitimate

Route 2Compromised account

A legitimate mailbox used to send or support a request

  1. MFA
  2. Conditional Access
  3. Mailbox activity visibility

Reduces the chance of account misuse and helps us recognise it earlier

Where both routes lead A request to change payment details
ControlVerification beyond email

High-risk changes are checked outside the message before they can proceed

The operating rule High-risk payment changes require verification beyond email.

What we delivered

The controls we strengthened along that path

01

Email authentication and sender checks

We strengthened email authentication and sender controls to reduce exposure to spoofed and lookalike senders. The review looked at how a message could appear to come from a trusted organisation or contact, and the inbound checks used to assess it.

Sender controls were set alongside anti-impersonation settings and the kinds of requests OYA regularly receives, so fraudulent messages are caught before they become part of normal correspondence.

02

Protection against executive and supplier impersonation

We tuned anti-impersonation protection around the executive and supplier identities attackers try to imitate, with attention to settlement updates, supplier requests and changes to payment details.

These are the messages most likely to be acted on because they resemble legitimate business. We focused the controls there while keeping ordinary payment instructions and documents flowing.

03

Identity protection, MFA and Conditional Access

We hardened identity controls across Microsoft 365, including MFA and Conditional Access, to reduce the opportunity for an attacker to use an OYA account to send or support a convincing request.

Handling identity in the same engagement as email security and payment verification linked account access with the business actions a compromised account could be used to influence.

04

Visibility of mailbox activity

We improved visibility of suspicious mailbox behaviour and the activity attackers rely on after gaining access, adding attention to how an account behaves once in use.

This supports earlier detection of misuse and faster containment, with activity reviewed in the context of the financial communications those accounts handle.

05

Verification before high-risk payment details change

We strengthened the payment-verification process so a high-risk payment-change request cannot be actioned from email alone. The requirement applies at the point where an instruction could alter where money is sent.

A convincing executive or supplier-style message still needs verification outside the message before a high-risk change goes ahead. The security work ends in a concrete operating rule for payment handling.

The outcome

A stronger defence around the decision to release funds

OYA gained stronger protection against impersonation and account compromise, better visibility of mailbox misuse and a defined verification requirement for high-risk payment changes. The response to a real incident was carried through into changes across Microsoft 365 and payment handling.

Sender and identity protection make a fraudulent request harder to establish, while payment verification covers the moment that request could become a financial loss.

Technology and service scope
Microsoft 365Email authenticationSender checksAnti-impersonationMFAConditional AccessMailbox visibilityIncident responsePayment verification
Next step

Strengthen the controls around email and payment changes

We review Microsoft 365, identity and payment-verification procedures together, then carry the improvements through into your systems and working practices.

Prefer email? contact@inlightit.com.au